Boeing Shareholders Reject Proposal Seeking Ideological Balance on Board

Photo by Jp Valery on Unsplash

Boeing shareholders today rejected a shareholder proposal calling on the company to consider viewpoint diversity when it seeks new board candidates.

Shareholder activists with the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise Project (FEP), which submitted the proposal, warn that this move threatens shareholders’ return on investment because it risks allowing Boeing to follow a dangerous trend toward partisan echo chambers in corporate boardrooms.

FEP’s proposal noted that:

boards that incorporate diverse perspectives can think more critically and oversee corporate managers more effectively. By providing a meaningful disclosure about potential Board members, shareholders will be better able to judge how well-suited individual board nominees are for the Company and whether their listed skills, experience and attributes are appropriate in light of the Company’s overall business strategy.…

True diversity comes from diversity of thought. There is ample evidence that the many companies operate in ideological hegemony that eschews conservative people, thoughts, and values. This ideological echo chamber can result in groupthink that is the antithesis of diversity. This can be a major risk factor for shareholders.

FEP’s entire proposal, entitled “True Diversity Board Policy,” as well as the opposition statement from Boeing’s board, are available on pages 68-69 of the company’s proxy statement.

The proposal was presented by FEP Coordinator Scott Shepard at Boeing’s annual shareholder meeting, held virtually today at 9 a.m. Central time. Shepard’s supporting statement, as prepared for delivery, can be read here and heard here.

Scott ShepardScott Shepard:

Shepard responded after the meeting:
Boeing has seen in just the last few weeks the importance of having ideological diversity on its board of directors. Boeing is a company that has in the past had a significant and positive impact on the American economy, but it is a company that is in a great deal of trouble today. That trouble is of its own making.

This didn’t stop it last month from seeking an enormous bailout from the federal government, just as the government’s – and all of our – resources are being stretched to their limit as we try to cope with an economy that has largely shut down in response to the COVID-19 virus. There are millions of Americans who are suffering financial and health hardship and even disaster for reasons that have nothing to do with them, over which they have no control.

Nikki Haley, who had been a member of Boeing’s board, recognized that this was a bad move. She knew that Boeing would put itself at serious reputational risk, as well as risk of increased government regulation, oversight and intervention, as a result of this tin-eared request at this perilous time. And so she resigned.

This was immediate, clear and high-level feedback. That sort of feedback will be entirely lacking at least half of the time if Boeing’s board of directors becomes the sort of partisan echo chamber that has developed at many other American companies.

Partisan, agenda-driven management is unwise wherever it is tried. We by this proposal sought to save Boeing from a fate that has befallen too many other American firms.

Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the nation’s largest proxy advisor, recommended that shareholders vote against FEP’s proposal. Pepsi, CVS, Walmart, Gap, Walgreens, Prudential and JPMorgan Chase have adopted FEP’s proposal.

“For years, ISS has urged its clients to approve any number of liberal shareholder proposals, including liberal board diversity resolutions that essentially call for affirmative action or a quota system. However, it is rejecting our call for viewpoint diversity,” notes Shepard.

“This is a clear demonstration that ISS is not a politically neutral force for social good, but a naked proponent of left-wing (and only left-wing) positions. Fund managers and large investors should start looking elsewhere for advice on proxy ballots. ISS isn’t looking out for their best interests, but simply pushing a political agenda. And investors should call their fund managers and demand they use a service other than ISS.”

 

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*